The past few years have undeniably highlighted life's unpredictable nature, and for Colorado homeowners, this unpredictability can cast a long shadow over real estate contracts. Whether you're a buyer, seller, landlord, or tenant, unforeseen events—from global pandemics to natural disasters—can throw meticulously planned agreements into disarray. The critical issue is what happens when circumstances beyond your control make fulfilling your contractual obligations difficult, impossible, or even pointless, potentially leading to costly breaches and legal disputes.

The implications of not understanding your options in such scenarios can be severe, impacting your financial stability and legal standing. The legal doctrines of force majeure, frustration of purpose, and impossibility can offer a lifeline, potentially excusing you from contract performance, but their application is highly nuanced and carries significant risks if mishandled. GLO specializes in guiding Colorado homeowners through these complex situations, helping you understand when and how these doctrines may apply to protect your interests and navigate contractual challenges with confidence.

The Technical and Risky Landscape of Excusing Contract Performance

While the desire to be released from a contract due to unforeseen circumstances is understandable, relying on legal doctrines like force majeure, frustration of purpose, or impossibility is a highly technical undertaking. Courts interpret these defenses very narrowly, making successful claims challenging and emphasizing the need for precise legal understanding.

The Strict Interpretation of Force Majeure Clauses: Beyond "Acts of God"

Many real estate contracts, including leases and purchase agreements, contain a force majeure clause, a contractual provision designed to excuse parties from performance if specified extraordinary events occur. However, the effectiveness of this clause hinges entirely on its specific language. It's not a catch-all for any inconvenient event. Historically, these clauses often focused on "acts of God" like earthquakes, floods, or fires. The COVID-19 pandemic, for example, brought into sharp focus whether a pandemic or related governmental shutdowns would qualify under existing force majeure language.

For a homeowner to successfully invoke a force majeure clause, they must demonstrate several critical elements: first, the event must be explicitly listed or clearly fall within a "catch-all" provision (like "governmental action" or "change in law"); second, the event must have been genuinely unforeseeable at the time the contract was entered into; and third, it must be the direct and primary cause rendering performance genuinely impossible or unreasonably expensive, despite the party's diligent and good-faith efforts to mitigate the impact. The risk for homeowners is significant: if the clause's language is not precise enough, if the event was deemed "foreseeable" (even if its specific impact wasn't), or if the party could have reasonably mitigated the damage, a court will likely deny relief. This means that a homeowner who unilaterally ceases performance based on a misinterpretation of a force majeure clause could be found in breach of contract, facing substantial financial penalties.

The High Bar for Frustration of Purpose and Impossibility of Performance

Even if your contract lacks a force majeure clause, common law doctrines like frustration of purpose and impossibility of performance might offer an avenue for relief. However, these are even more difficult to prove in court, as Colorado courts, like others, apply them very narrowly. The underlying principle is that contracts allocate risk, and courts are reluctant to shift that risk merely because one party finds performance more burdensome or less profitable than anticipated.

Frustration of purpose applies when the sole or principal purpose for entering the contract has been completely destroyed by an unforeseen event, rendering the entire transaction pointless. For example, if a homeowner rented a venue solely for a large family reunion, and a government order then prohibited all gatherings of that size, a claim for frustration might be possible. The critical element is "sole purpose." If the property could still be used for any other viable purpose (e.g., if it was a house rented for both living and business, and only the business was affected), a frustration claim would likely fail. This means that for a homeowner trying to exit a real estate contract, proving that the entire reason for the agreement has vanished, not just that it has become less appealing or profitable, is an extremely high bar.

Similarly, the doctrine of impossibility of performance requires that the unforeseen event make contractual performance truly "impracticable" due to extreme and unreasonable difficulty, expense, injury, or loss. It's not about making a bad deal; it's about a supervening event that fundamentally alters the nature of the obligation. For instance, if a specific house under contract for sale is destroyed by an unforeseen natural disaster before closing, rebuilding it might be deemed "impossible" under the original terms due to extreme cost. However, mere economic hardship, such as a drop in market value or increased financing costs due to a pandemic, is typically insufficient to claim impossibility. For homeowners, the danger in relying on these doctrines without expert legal advice is significant: an unsuccessful claim means you remain bound by the original contract, potentially incurring substantial damages for breach, all while having invested time and money in a failed legal argument.

How GLO Can Help

Navigating real estate contracts during periods of unforeseen disruption requires a precise understanding of complex legal principles and a strategic approach. At GLO, our experienced Colorado real estate attorneys are equipped to guide homeowners through these challenging situations, providing clear advice and robust representation.

If you believe your real estate contract has been impacted by an unforeseen event, GLO can meticulously review your agreement, analyzing the language of any force majeure clauses and assessing the viability of common law defenses like frustration of purpose or impossibility of performance. We will help you understand the specific legal thresholds you must meet and the evidence required to support your claim. Our team assists in all phases, from drafting compelling demand letters and engaging in strategic negotiations with the other party to, if necessary, representing your interests in litigation. Whether you are a buyer seeking to withdraw from a purchase due to unexpected circumstances, a seller struggling with a buyer's non-performance, or a landlord or tenant grappling with lease obligations, GLO provides the experienced legal counsel necessary to protect your rights and find the most favorable path forward in these difficult and often unprecedented situations.

Please fill out an Intake Form to inquire about working with GLO.

Explore our reviews to see how we’ve helped countless clients achieve their real estate and business goals.

GLO has prepared this blog to provide general information on legal issues that may be of interest. This blog does not provide legal advice for any specific situation and this does not create an attorney-client relationship between any reader and GLO or its attorneys. GLO engages clients only through specific signed fee agreements. GLO does not guarantee any results.

Contracts, COVID-19, and Course of Action: Real Estate Contracts During a Pandemic